header-logo header-logo

Tug of war

07 July 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer on the battle to secure effective interim damages payments

In compensation claims for serious head and spinal injuries, the claimant’s solicitor will often try to secure an early interim payment of damages under CPR 25 to fund the costs of care and/or suitably adapted accommodation. Waiting several years until the end of the case before proper care is put in place can be very detrimental to the claimant.

Conversely, defendant insurers often want to resist making a substantial interim payment. Defendants argue that if the claimant secures a large interim payment and uses it to purchase a property and establish a care regime, it can be difficult at a subsequent trial for the defendant to effectively challenge the property and care package after the event.

Interim payments

CPR 25 empowers the court to award an interim payment where the claimant has obtained interlocutory judgment, or where the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial sum from the defendant if the action went to trial. However, CPR 25.7 (4) provides that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll