header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Tug of war

Richard Scorer on the battle to secure effective interim damages payments

In compensation claims for serious head and spinal injuries, the claimant’s solicitor will often try to secure an early interim payment of damages under CPR 25 to fund the costs of care and/or suitably adapted accommodation. Waiting several years until the end of the case before proper care is put in place can be very detrimental to the claimant.

Conversely, defendant insurers often want to resist making a substantial interim payment. Defendants argue that if the claimant secures a large interim payment and uses it to purchase a property and establish a care regime, it can be difficult at a subsequent trial for the defendant to effectively challenge the property and care package after the event.

Interim payments

CPR 25 empowers the court to award an interim payment where the claimant has obtained interlocutory judgment, or where the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial sum from the defendant if the action went to trial. However, CPR 25.7 (4) provides that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll