header-logo header-logo

08 November 2013 / James Wilson
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Tugboats & pettyfoggery

web_backpage

James Wilson finds one of Mark Twain’s biggest fans in the Court of Appeal

If there is a judge in modern times whose wit deserves comparison with the likes of Mark Twain, it is undoubtedly the now retired Sir Alan Ward, for 18 years a stalwart of the Court of Appeal, Civil Division. So it was no surprise that in his penultimate judgment, delivered after his formal retirement, a quotation from Mr Twain (real name Samuel Clemens) featured prominently and appropriately. The case, Reeves v Northrop [2013] EWCA Civ 362, concerned something with which the 19th century American author would have been thoroughly engaged—a wayfaring life aboard a houseboat. Unfortunately, it also featured two rather less engaging things which modern day English lawyers find tiresomely familiar, namely abysmally drafted legislation and pettyfoggering local authorities.

 

Tugboat tale

The case was brought by one Randy Northrop. He was a Californian in origin, but more of a wanderer in spirit. He moved to England in the late 1980s and purchased an old tug boat, the MY

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll