header-logo header-logo

24 August 2011
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fees row sparks university challenge

Scottish universities have been accused of discrimination for charging tuition fees to UK students who are not Scottish

Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) are considering a judicial review challenge against Scottish universities for charging fees to students from England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

They claim it is discriminatory that Scottish students (and students from other EU member states who must be treated in the same way under EU rules) do not pay fees if they attend Scottish universities, while English students do.

Scottish students, along with other UK students, pay fees if they attend universities in England, Wales or Northern Ireland.

Historically, Scotland has always had a separate education system—school pupils sit Highers not A Levels, Honours degrees last four not three years and arts graduates are usually awarded MAs not BAs. It is common for students to begin university aged 17 and, in some cases, just 16, as Highers are taken after one years' study not two.

According to press reports, PIL will argue that Scottish students’ free education discriminates against non-Scottish UK students in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Equality Act 2010, which bans racial discrimination.

A Scottish government spokesperson said they were confident the Scottish fees system was lawful, and that tuition fee arrangements are based on "ordinary domicile" not nationality.

PIL are also representing two students in their judicial review to challenge the tripling of tuition fees across the UK to up to £9,000 each year.

The Scottish executive said in June that it would expect average fees across Scottish universities to be less than in the rest of the UK.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll