header-logo header-logo

Turning the tide

26 July 2007 / Sir Geoffrey Vos
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government should be promoting the law as a public service, says Geoffrey Vos QC

The legal profession is deeply unpopular. Or so it seems to many lawyers in all areas of practice up and down the country. This unpopularity seems to have four aspects—unpopularity with consumer organisations, with the public, with the tabloid press and, worst of all, with the government.
It is useful to examine why this might be the case, what we can do about it, and whether the problem is a purely British one. It is true that some—but relatively few—lawyers earn large sums of money, but then so do actors, film stars, footballers, bankers and private equity partners. It is true that some—though very few—lawyers bring their profession into disrepute, but then so do some accountants, actuaries, architects and surveyors. It is true that some—though again, in absolute terms, few—complaints against lawyers have been badly handled in the past, but then so have complaints against many other professionals.

CONSUMER ORGANISATIONS

Consumer organisations seem to have rational grounds for their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll