header-logo header-logo

08 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration , International
printer mail-detail

UK confirms it will sign the Singapore Convention on Mediation

The government has committed itself to ratifying the Singapore Convention on Mediation, in a move welcomed by the legal profession

The convention provides a framework for the recognition and enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements reached via mediation. It enables a party to enforce a cross-border mediated agreement in any country that is party to the convention without needed to launch an action for breach of contract. The convention also establishes rules on procedures for cooperation on the taking of evidence, service of legal documents and cooperation between competent authorities.

Some 55 countries have signed it since it opened for signature in 2019, and it has been ratified by 10 countries, Fiji, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Ecuador, Honduras, Turkey, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Singapore.

The government consulted on whether to join the convention in February 2022, with a majority of responses received in favour of ratification. In a statement this week, Justice minister Lord Bellamy said the government had concluded ‘it is the right time for the UK to become a party to the convention’ and would sign it as soon as possible.

Lord Bellamy said: ‘This decision will be a clear signal to our international partners that the UK is committed to maintaining and strengthening its position as a centre for dispute resolution and to promote the UK’s flourishing legal and mediation sectors.’

Bar Council vice chair Sam Townend KC said: ‘Barristers make excellent mediators and mediation advocates; the profession leads the world in the provision of mediation as one of many forms of dispute resolution.

‘The Bar Council welcomes the UK government’s commitment to ratify the Singapore Convention. The move bolsters confidence in the UK legal sector and is further recognition of the vital contribution that British lawyers make to UK exports.’

Henrietta Jackson-Stops, member of the London International Disputes Week (LIDW) Strategy Group, said the government’s decision was ‘a clear indication of the UK's ambition to remain a global leader in the development of international dispute resolution.

‘Signing the convention will give added weight to London as a centre to resolve disputes and help raise the profile of mediation. The wider dispute resolution offering is a key agenda item for discussion at LIDW23, which will be an even hotter topic given this news.’

Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll