header-logo header-logo

UK confirms it will sign the Singapore Convention on Mediation

08 March 2023
Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration , International
printer mail-detail
The government has committed itself to ratifying the Singapore Convention on Mediation, in a move welcomed by the legal profession

The convention provides a framework for the recognition and enforcement of international commercial settlement agreements reached via mediation. It enables a party to enforce a cross-border mediated agreement in any country that is party to the convention without needed to launch an action for breach of contract. The convention also establishes rules on procedures for cooperation on the taking of evidence, service of legal documents and cooperation between competent authorities.

Some 55 countries have signed it since it opened for signature in 2019, and it has been ratified by 10 countries, Fiji, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Ecuador, Honduras, Turkey, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Singapore.

The government consulted on whether to join the convention in February 2022, with a majority of responses received in favour of ratification. In a statement this week, Justice minister Lord Bellamy said the government had concluded ‘it is the right time for the UK to become a party to the convention’ and would sign it as soon as possible.

Lord Bellamy said: ‘This decision will be a clear signal to our international partners that the UK is committed to maintaining and strengthening its position as a centre for dispute resolution and to promote the UK’s flourishing legal and mediation sectors.’

Bar Council vice chair Sam Townend KC said: ‘Barristers make excellent mediators and mediation advocates; the profession leads the world in the provision of mediation as one of many forms of dispute resolution.

‘The Bar Council welcomes the UK government’s commitment to ratify the Singapore Convention. The move bolsters confidence in the UK legal sector and is further recognition of the vital contribution that British lawyers make to UK exports.’

Henrietta Jackson-Stops, member of the London International Disputes Week (LIDW) Strategy Group, said the government’s decision was ‘a clear indication of the UK's ambition to remain a global leader in the development of international dispute resolution.

‘Signing the convention will give added weight to London as a centre to resolve disputes and help raise the profile of mediation. The wider dispute resolution offering is a key agenda item for discussion at LIDW23, which will be an even hotter topic given this news.’

Issue: 8016 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll