header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007 / Heather Stewart
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Unchartered territory

Busy lawyers can be excellent managers but it won’t happen overnight, says Heather Stewart

Crystal ball gazing is becoming harder: we do not know what the future will bring, and many smaller firms feel particularly vulnerable. The Clementi and Carter reports and the Legal Services Bill have all created uncertainty and the prospect of a highly dynamic environment. The only certainty is that the firms that will survive and prosper are those that are prepared for change and ready to move whenever opportunities present themselves. This agility of approach includes having the courage to drop work that involves heavy resource for limited return in favour of investment in new services or changed ways of working. Getting there will depend on good leadership and management.

Some firms welcome the future and the potential opportunities. They are well-led, and together run a commercial organisation, working as a team with mutual trust. They offer a well-defined range of services, and manage their resources and members whose skills they develop for the benefit of the firm. Firm-wide standards are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll