header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 October 2007 / Gerallt Owen , Gary Summers
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Under attack

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Companies should expect the OFT to take an aggressive approach to cartel investigations, say Gary Summers and Gerallt Owen

The global approach of multi-jurisdictional US-led law enforcement is evident in cartels. Cartels—or antitrust in the US—take many different forms, but essentially consist of two or more commercial undertakings entering into anti-competitive/collusive arrangements. Evidenced by a secret agreement or arrangement, the intention of those taking part is to restrict competition by fixing prices, restricting output, dividing up the market, or blocking competition from third parties or new entrants to the market.

CRIMINAL CARTEL OFFENCE

In the UK, the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002), s 188 introduced a statutory criminal cartel offence. The offence and the related powers of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and/or Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to investigate the offence are provided for. It is envisaged that the SFO will have the option of being the lead investigator.

The criminal cartel offence can only be committed by individuals, and not by undertakings, and the offence is punishable up to a maximum of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll