header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
11 October 2007 / Gerallt Owen , Gary Summers
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Under attack

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Companies should expect the OFT to take an aggressive approach to cartel investigations, say Gary Summers and Gerallt Owen

The global approach of multi-jurisdictional US-led law enforcement is evident in cartels. Cartels—or antitrust in the US—take many different forms, but essentially consist of two or more commercial undertakings entering into anti-competitive/collusive arrangements. Evidenced by a secret agreement or arrangement, the intention of those taking part is to restrict competition by fixing prices, restricting output, dividing up the market, or blocking competition from third parties or new entrants to the market.

CRIMINAL CARTEL OFFENCE

In the UK, the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002), s 188 introduced a statutory criminal cartel offence. The offence and the related powers of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and/or Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to investigate the offence are provided for. It is envisaged that the SFO will have the option of being the lead investigator.

The criminal cartel offence can only be committed by individuals, and not by undertakings, and the offence is punishable up to a maximum of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll