header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007 / Gerallt Owen , Gary Summers
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Under attack

Companies should expect the OFT to take an aggressive approach to cartel investigations, say Gary Summers and Gerallt Owen

The global approach of multi-jurisdictional US-led law enforcement is evident in cartels. Cartels—or antitrust in the US—take many different forms, but essentially consist of two or more commercial undertakings entering into anti-competitive/collusive arrangements. Evidenced by a secret agreement or arrangement, the intention of those taking part is to restrict competition by fixing prices, restricting output, dividing up the market, or blocking competition from third parties or new entrants to the market.

CRIMINAL CARTEL OFFENCE

In the UK, the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002), s 188 introduced a statutory criminal cartel offence. The offence and the related powers of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and/or Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to investigate the offence are provided for. It is envisaged that the SFO will have the option of being the lead investigator.

The criminal cartel offence can only be committed by individuals, and not by undertakings, and the offence is punishable up to a maximum of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll