header-logo header-logo

19 June 2015 / Daniel Robinson
Issue: 7657 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Under review

nlj_7657_robinson

Daniel Robinson puts charity law under the spotlight

The Charities Act 2006 introduced wide-ranging reforms to charity law. In 2012, Lord Hodgson published his root-and-branch review of the Act and some of his recommendations were referred to the Law Commission for further consideration. We consulted on social investment by charities in 2014. We then recommended the creation of a new statutory power for charities to make social investments with a statutory statement of charity trustees’ duties when doing so.

Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill

We drafted a Bill to give effect to our recommendations, which was included within the Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill, introduced shortly after the Queen’s Speech. As well as implementing our recommendations on social investment, the Bill would implement the government’s proposals to give further powers to the Charity Commission to protect charities and make provision for the disqualification of charity trustees.

Our current consultation

The Law Commission is now consulting on the remaining issues within its charity law project. We have grappled with a wide range of knotty problems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll