header-logo header-logo

30 April 2009 / Rob Hann
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Public , EU
printer mail-detail

Under the spotlight

Procurement challenges are on the increase. Rob Hann explains why

Over the past few years, an increasing number of procurement challenges have reached the courts. Indeed the Achilles Themis report (7 December 2008) indicated that there had been a significant (70%) increase in European Court of Justice (ECJ) cases reaching the courts in the last two years alleging procurement transgressions of one sort or another.

Generally these challenges have been brought by aggrieved or losing bidders against contracting authorities. Many of the cases have focused on the thorny issue of how and what contract award criteria have been applied by the local authority (or other contracting authority) in the process leading up to the appointment of the successful bidder/tenderer. This has become a high risk issue for all procurement practitioners and it is essential that local authorities and those advising them, have a thorough understanding of how and when to use contract award criteria and what principles have been developed from these cases.

The credit crunch too is having an effect. Bidders who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll