header-logo header-logo

Under the spotlight

30 April 2009 / Rob Hann
Issue: 7367 / Categories: Features , Public , EU
printer mail-detail

Procurement challenges are on the increase. Rob Hann explains why

Over the past few years, an increasing number of procurement challenges have reached the courts. Indeed the Achilles Themis report (7 December 2008) indicated that there had been a significant (70%) increase in European Court of Justice (ECJ) cases reaching the courts in the last two years alleging procurement transgressions of one sort or another.

Generally these challenges have been brought by aggrieved or losing bidders against contracting authorities. Many of the cases have focused on the thorny issue of how and what contract award criteria have been applied by the local authority (or other contracting authority) in the process leading up to the appointment of the successful bidder/tenderer. This has become a high risk issue for all procurement practitioners and it is essential that local authorities and those advising them, have a thorough understanding of how and when to use contract award criteria and what principles have been developed from these cases.

The credit crunch too is having an effect. Bidders who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll