header-logo header-logo

03 April 2026 / Marie Law
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Features , Family , Profession
printer mail-detail

*Partner copy* Understanding the main drug groups in family proceedings

246239
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explores the growing complexity of drug misuse in family proceedings and why a clearer understanding of the main drug groups is essential for legal professionals

Drug misuse remains a recurrent feature in family proceedings, often shaping decisions around safeguarding, supervision and contact.

However, the substance abuse landscape is no longer confined to heroin, cocaine, and cannabis. Toxicology laboratories are seeing an increase in controlled prescription drug misuse, the continued emergence of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS), and a marked rise in poly-drug use.

In addition, street drugs are increasingly adulterated or contaminated, meaning individuals may be unaware of the full range of substances they have consumed, many of which fall outside standard drug testing panels and may not be detected unless specifically requested.

For legal practitioners, it is no longer enough to know whether someone has taken a drug. Understanding what that drug is, how it is classified, and how it is typically used is equally important.

Legislative classifications

In family cases, how a substance is classified under UK law can have a real bearing on how risk is assessed and how evidence is framed.

  • The principal legislative framework remains the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA), which categorises controlled drugs as Class A, B or C according to their assessed harm.
  • The Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 (PSA) was introduced to address the proliferation of so-called ‘legal highs’, synthetic substances designed to mimic the effects of controlled drugs.
  • The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 govern prescription-only medicines that are not controlled under the MDA but may still be subject to misuse.

Importantly, legal status does not necessarily reflect safeguarding risk. A substance may be lawfully prescribed, yet misused in a manner that impairs cognition, behaviour, or parenting capacity.

Key drug groups now appearing in family cases

While traditional illicit drugs remain relevant, family practitioners are increasingly encountering a broader spectrum of substances in legally-instructed testing:

  • Opioids feature prominently, ranging from heroin to prescribed medications such as methadone, buprenorphine and fentanyl. Although many of these drugs have legitimate therapeutic roles (e.g. opioid substitution therapy, pain management), misuse carries significant risks.
  • Cannabinoids now extend beyond cannabis to include synthetic variants such as ‘Spice’, often associated with unpredictable behavioural effects.
  • Hallucinogens including ketamine are appearing more frequently.

We are also seeing increasing misuse of prescription-only medications including anticonvulsants like gabapentin and pregabalin, antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anabolic steroids.

These substances may be lawfully prescribed, yet excessive or non-prescribed use can contribute to mood instability, cognitive impairment, or behavioural volatility.

Why this matters when instructing drug tests

Understanding the main drug groups can help shape the scope of testing instructed and avoid gaps in the evidential picture.

Standard drug panels are designed to detect the most misused controlled substances. However, where prescription drug misuse, synthetic cannabinoids, or emerging psychoactive substances are suspected, an extended panel may be required.

Results must also be interpreted within clinical and behavioural context. The presence of a prescribed medication does not automatically indicate misuse; conversely, lawful access does not negate safeguarding concerns.

A new reference guide for legal professionals

In response to demand for our previous guide, Drug & Alcohol Testing: a summary of testing options, we have developed a complementary guide for family law professionals: The main drug groups in the UK: legislation, medical applications and symptoms of misuse.

The guide provides:

  • A breakdown of the main drug groups and classifications
  • Details of medical conditions for which listed drugs may be prescribed
  • Most common symptoms of misuse (by drug group)

To request print or digital copies of either guide, or to request a quote for drug & alcohol testing, call our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300, email testing@alphabiolabs.com, or complete our online quote form athttps://www.alphabiolabs.co.uk/legal-test-forms/.

Image: © Shutterstock

 


 

Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A highly-skilled and respected scientist with over 15 years’ experience in the field of forensics, Marie joined AlphaBiolabs in 2022 and oversees the company’s growing toxicology team.
As Director of Toxicology, Marie’s day-to-day responsibilities include maintaining the highest quality testing standards for toxicology and further enhancing AlphaBiolabs’ drug and alcohol testing services for the legal sector, members of the public, and the workplace sector.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll