header-logo header-logo

28 June 2007 / Mark Conway , Natalie Ledgard
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

An unhappy mix

New criminal provisions relating to under age alcohol sales could be ruinous for unwary licence holders, say Mark Conway and Natalie Ledgard

On 6 April 2007 the new offence of persistently selling alcohol to children came into effect through the Licensing Act 2003 (LA 2003), s 147A, following amendment by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 (VCRA 2006), s 23.

Section 147A is detailed, but at the heart of the offence is the concept of “persistent selling”, defined as the unlawful sale of alcohol on three different occasions within three consecutive months, on the same premises, to a person aged under 18.
The other elements of the offence are:
- The premises from which each sale is made must be either licensed premises or premises authorised to be used for a permitted temporary activity.
- The offence can be committed only by a responsible person, defined as either the premises licence holder or the person who is the premises user in relation to a permitted temporary activity (LA 2003, s 147A(4)).

THE PENALTY

The maximum fine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll