header-logo header-logo

01 October 2010
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A unified judiciary

The lord chief justice is to take over leadership of the tribunal’s judiciary.

The lord chief justice is to take over leadership of the tribunal’s judiciary.
Kenneth Clarke QC, the lord chancellor, said the change requires primary legislation and would be included in a Bill as soon as Parliamentary time allows.

Work is already underway on plans, announced in March, to merge the Tribunals Service with HM Court Service, and is expected to be completed by next April.

Following discussions with the lord chief justice and the senior president of tribunals, Clarke agreed that at the same time as the administration of the courts and tribunals was brought together, their judicial structure should be reviewed.

Clarke said: “Our shared vision is to work towards a unified judiciary encompassing both courts and tribunals.”
One possibility mooted by Clarke is to transfer the statutory powers of the senior president of tribunals to the lord chief justice, and to create a new office of head of tribunals justice with a statutory obligation to protect and develop the tribunals.

Discussions are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll