header-logo header-logo

07 March 2008
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION—DISTRIBUTION OF SURPLUS ASSETS AMONG MEMBERS—ONLY ONE SURVIVING MEMBER

Hanchett-Stamford v HM Attorney General and another [2008] EWHC 330 (Ch)

Chancery Division

Lewison J

27 February 2008

The sole surviving member of an unincorporated association is able to claim the assets of the association; they do not vest in the Crown as bona vacantia.

Alison MacLennan (instructed by Shirley May Yard) for the claimant.

Hugh Sims (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the first defendant. The second defendant did not appear and was not represented

Gwilym Harbottle (instructed by Dickinson Dees LLP) for Barclarys Bank, as intervener.

The Performing and Captive Animals Defence League (the league) was founded in 1914. Its aims included the introduction of legislation outlawing circus tricks and animal films depicting cruelty. It was never a registered charity. The claimant and her husband joined the league in the mid-1960s as life members. Her husband exercised effective control of the assets.

In the early 1990s, a property was purchased. The title was registered in the name of the husband and another member as trustees for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll