header-logo header-logo

15 December 2017 / Barry Fletcher
Issue: 7774 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

A unique ADR perspective

nlj_7774_fletcher

Is Hong Kong ready for the One Belt, One Road ‘goldrush’? Barry Fletcher reports

Two subjects dominated the early stages of Hong Kong’s sixth annual Arbitration Week: the high winds and lashing rain of tropical storm Khanun as it swept towards the Special Administrative Region, and China’s behemoth ‘One Belt, One Road Initiative’ (OBOR). It was clear that while Khanun’s effects were fleeting, the actual and potential impact of OBOR is a force to reckon with in Asia and beyond. This article considers Hong Kong’s ability to capitalise on dispute resolution work arising, now or in the future, out of OBOR disputes, with a focus on commercial arbitration and mediation.

OBOR & dispute resolution

Although originally conceived by China in 2013, OBOR (or the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’) is firmly on the current global agenda, and refers to the Chinese government’s significant investment and development strategy with the expressed intention of promoting economic co-operation among countries along OBOR routes. OBOR aims to connect Asia, Europe and Africa via land and sea and, while

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll