header-logo header-logo

03 June 2016
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

United apart

Can family court proceedings under Sch 1 to the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), effectively for the family home to be preserved for the benefit of the minor children of the unmarried parties, be linked up with family court proceedings under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (ToLATA 1996) for that very same property to be sold? If so, presumably they should be heard at the same time rather than consolidated but should this be in the county court or the family court?

Where there are contemporaneous applications before the court under these two Acts and questions arise in both as to property interests or the sale or preservation of property, the proceedings should be heard at the same time and by the same judge if possible: see W v W (Joinder of Trusts of Land Act and Children Act Applications) [2003] EWCA Civ 924, [2003] All ER (D) 252 (May). ToLATA 1996 applications are not family proceedings and cannot be heard in the family court; conversely the CA 1989 application (unless

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll