header-logo header-logo

United apart

03 June 2016
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Can family court proceedings under Sch 1 to the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), effectively for the family home to be preserved for the benefit of the minor children of the unmarried parties, be linked up with family court proceedings under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (ToLATA 1996) for that very same property to be sold? If so, presumably they should be heard at the same time rather than consolidated but should this be in the county court or the family court?

Where there are contemporaneous applications before the court under these two Acts and questions arise in both as to property interests or the sale or preservation of property, the proceedings should be heard at the same time and by the same judge if possible: see W v W (Joinder of Trusts of Land Act and Children Act Applications) [2003] EWCA Civ 924, [2003] All ER (D) 252 (May). ToLATA 1996 applications are not family proceedings and cannot be heard in the family court; conversely the CA 1989 application (unless

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll