header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

University—Conferring of degrees—Plagiarism

Mustafa v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 323 (May)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Males J, 23 May 2013

Not all allegations of plagiarism involve academic judgment and so will fall outwith the jurisdiction of the office of the independent adjudicator (OIA). In most cases, however, they will do so and therefore the OIA will be precluded from considering them.

David Lawson & Leon Glenister (instructed by Fisher Meredith LLP) for the claimant. Aileen McColgan (instructed by E J Winter & Son LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant had been studying for a Master’s degree. As part of the course he was required to submit an essay. In June 2008, the claimant was informed that his essay was being reviewed for suspected plagiarism. In July 2008, the claimant was told that he had used extensive quotations without the use of quotation marks. The claimant contended that he had made sufficiently clear that he was quoting from sources by using numbers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll