header-logo header-logo

University—Conferring of degrees—Plagiarism

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mustafa v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 323 (May)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Males J, 23 May 2013

Not all allegations of plagiarism involve academic judgment and so will fall outwith the jurisdiction of the office of the independent adjudicator (OIA). In most cases, however, they will do so and therefore the OIA will be precluded from considering them.

David Lawson & Leon Glenister (instructed by Fisher Meredith LLP) for the claimant. Aileen McColgan (instructed by E J Winter & Son LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant had been studying for a Master’s degree. As part of the course he was required to submit an essay. In June 2008, the claimant was informed that his essay was being reviewed for suspected plagiarism. In July 2008, the claimant was told that he had used extensive quotations without the use of quotation marks. The claimant contended that he had made sufficiently clear that he was quoting from sources by using numbers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll