header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Unneccesary distress

family_11

Dorothea Gartland considers the high cost of child protection

The Court of Appeal decision in A v East Sussex County Council & Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2010] EWCA Civ 743 was handed down earlier this month (2 July). Mr Justice Hedley gave the judgment of the court, which concerned a claim for damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 by a mother whose child was removed from hospital by police using police protection powers.

The court gave permission to appeal but refused the appeal. Paragraph 21 sets out the position taken by the court: “Sadly the experiences of the appellant simply illustrate the truth that viable child protection procedures in any society will sometimes inflict what turns out to have been unnecessary distress on families. That does not make them or the exercise of them thereby unlawful.”

The facts

The 22-year-old mother had brought her two-month-old baby to hospital and told treating doctors that there had been two episodes where the child had stopped breathing. The child was kept in hospital from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll