header-logo header-logo

16 September 2010 / Peter Ward
Issue: 7433 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Unwanted exposure

Peter Ward discusses the unseen dangers of hidden asbestos fibres

In an effort to reduce the current economic deficit, the new coalition government has recently scrapped the outgoing Labour government’s Building Schools for the Future scheme. While financial savings may be made, a worrying consequence that hasn’t been discussed is the hidden cost to the health of those working in and attending our schools.
Asbestos is rife in old school buildings and over recent years there have been an increasing number of claims for damages by those who allege exposure to asbestos fibres in schools.

Inherent danger

Most of the existing schools in England were built after the Second World War. Any schools built up until the early 1980s could have used asbestos or so-called “Asbestos Containing Materials” (ACMs) in their construction. Similarly any repairs carried out during that time could have made use of asbestos. ACMs were used widely in many schools – most commonly for heat insulation, fireproofing, ceiling tiles and wall panels. As long as ACMs are undamaged, undisturbed and maintained they pose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll