header-logo header-logo

03 June 2016
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Unwelcome x 2

If an assured shorthold tenancy contains a break clause exercisable by the landlord by notice, is it sufficient for the landlord simply to give the tenant notice under s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 which omits any reference to the contractual term?

A s 21 notice alone has the potential to rank as an effective notice under the break clause so long as all the requirements of the break clause are satisfied by it and so a careful consideration of what it provides for would be needed. If, for example, the break clause can only be exercised in the event of a specified contractual breach by the tenant then it may be that a bare s 21 notice will not be sufficient to perform the dual role. It should be noted that in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy granted on or after 1 October 2015 landlords cannot give a section 21 notice within the first four months of the term and they must follow up giving a section 21 notice with the commencement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll