header-logo header-logo

21 October 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Upside down?

Dominic Regan visits the case of the winner who lost to the loser who won

Typically, in a given dispute there will ultimately be a winner and a loser. Sadly, the Court of Appeal has just demonstrated that it cannot tell which is which, in the case of Medway Primary Care Trust v Marcus [2011] EWCA Civ 750, [2011] All ER (D) 219 (Jun). Not only does the decision show how intractable costs issues have become, it also gives one an inkling of how horrific things will become for claimants if legal aid were removed from clinical negligence claims, a measure which Lord Justice Jackson does not support.

Inevitable amputation?

Mr Marcus, aged 31, had to have his leg amputated. He blamed two doctors whom he had previously consulted. By the time he was admitted to hospital the position was irretrievable and the leg was lost. Quantum was agreed at £525,000 but liability was not. As so often is alleged in these matters,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll