header-logo header-logo

Upside down?

21 October 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan visits the case of the winner who lost to the loser who won

Typically, in a given dispute there will ultimately be a winner and a loser. Sadly, the Court of Appeal has just demonstrated that it cannot tell which is which, in the case of Medway Primary Care Trust v Marcus [2011] EWCA Civ 750, [2011] All ER (D) 219 (Jun). Not only does the decision show how intractable costs issues have become, it also gives one an inkling of how horrific things will become for claimants if legal aid were removed from clinical negligence claims, a measure which Lord Justice Jackson does not support.

Inevitable amputation?

Mr Marcus, aged 31, had to have his leg amputated. He blamed two doctors whom he had previously consulted. By the time he was admitted to hospital the position was irretrievable and the leg was lost. Quantum was agreed at £525,000 but liability was not. As so often is alleged in these matters,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll