header-logo header-logo

Upside down?

21 October 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan visits the case of the winner who lost to the loser who won

Typically, in a given dispute there will ultimately be a winner and a loser. Sadly, the Court of Appeal has just demonstrated that it cannot tell which is which, in the case of Medway Primary Care Trust v Marcus [2011] EWCA Civ 750, [2011] All ER (D) 219 (Jun). Not only does the decision show how intractable costs issues have become, it also gives one an inkling of how horrific things will become for claimants if legal aid were removed from clinical negligence claims, a measure which Lord Justice Jackson does not support.

Inevitable amputation?

Mr Marcus, aged 31, had to have his leg amputated. He blamed two doctors whom he had previously consulted. By the time he was admitted to hospital the position was irretrievable and the leg was lost. Quantum was agreed at £525,000 but liability was not. As so often is alleged in these matters,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll