header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Urgent action needed on advice ‘deserts’

MPs and Peers have highlighted the paucity of legal aid access in England and Wales and called for ‘urgent’ action to tackle the lack of legal advice available for people on low incomes.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights expressed ‘grave concerns for access to justice, the rule of law, and enforcement of human rights in the UK’, in a detailed report published this week, Enforcing human rights. They warned that large areas of the country have become ‘legal aid deserts’ as lawyers can no longer afford to provide these services to clients.

The committee, chaired by Harriet Harman MP, concludes that reductions to legal aid and reforms to the system have resulted in a situation where many people find it ‘simply unaffordable’ to enforce their human rights.

The government is currently reviewing LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012), which cut legal aid from large areas of civil and family law in April 2013.

The committee recommended that a review of the ‘broader landscape of legal advice and support’ urgently be taken, and that the financial eligibility criteria for legal aid be reconsidered and brought in line with the criteria for welfare benefits. It noted that the criteria has become more restrictive since LASPO.

It called for more legal support for families at inquests, and for urgent reform of the Exceptional Case Funding Scheme which funds only a few hundred cases rather than the 7,000 per year it was expected to support.

Other recommendations included that a statutory duty to uphold the independence of the judiciary be incorporated into the Ministerial Code; and that the Equality and Human Rights Commission be able to take human rights cases as well as equality cases.

Harman said: ‘For rights to be effective they have to be capable of being enforced.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll