header-logo header-logo

16 September 2026
Issue: 8177 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Regulatory , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Urgent action needed on artificial intelligence risks

MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)

In a report published this week, the Joint Committee on Human Rights recommended the government create a single AI regulator ‘with the teeth to ensure enforcement’ and a regulatory regime covering the whole AI lifecycle.

Legislation should be enacted, imposing a due diligence obligation at all stages of design, development and deployment to prevent risk to human rights. Moreover, some uses of AI should be banned outright because they are incompatible with human rights, including subliminal techniques and inappropriate use of profiling or biometric data, the committee said.

Committee chair Alex Sobel MP said: ‘We need these protections now.’

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said: ‘Everyone including the legal profession requires clear guidance on AI. We need to know how the existing regulatory framework applies to data security, oversight, reserved legal activities and professional obligations.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll