header-logo header-logo

Use a picture—it’s worth a thousand words

10 February 2021 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
38843
Coronavirus regulations: out with impenetrable legalese & in with pictures, graphs & diagrams, say Charles Auld & Kate Harrington
  • Current coronavirus regulations are to be found in numerous precisely worded but borderline incomprehensible statutory instruments.
  • The government could ensure far greater understanding and adherence by presenting the regulations in ways that everyone can understand.

As everybody needs to comply with the COVID-19 restrictions, is it too much to ask that they be drafted in such a way that the general public can understand them? Sadly, however, we have been presented with a plethora of statutory instruments so complex that they are barely understandable by lawyers. If the government had recognised that public accessibility was the primary consideration, it would surely have issued the regulations using diagrams and tables, rather than creating a linguistic behemoth that can only be properly understood by someone who has access to a substantial database of statutes and statutory instruments.

For the man on the Clapham omnibus

It is said that the much-maligned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll