header-logo header-logo

Valuable tactics

25 February 2010 / Steven Lynch
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Steven Lynch traces trends in personal injury disposal hearings

A defendant who fails to file an “acknowledgment of service” in response to a claim may have a default judgment entered against him. In such cases, and where liability of personal injury (PI) is not in dispute, costs of a defence are reduced and time in completing necessary quantum allocation questionnaires is saved.

Further, the court is given the opportunity to exercise its case management powers earlier as a “disposal” hearing will usually be listed within six to eight weeks from the date judgment was entered.

According to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), in PI claims the default judgment is “for an amount to be decided by the court and costs”.  Paragraph 12.4 of Practice Direction [PD] 26 states:
l The disposal hearing will not last longer than 30 minutes.
l Oral evidence is not usually heard.
l The court can either assess damages or give directions as to the future conduct of the proceedings.
l Evidence at a disposal hearing is by witness statement and statement of cases/application notices provided those

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll