header-logo header-logo

25 February 2010 / Steven Lynch
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Valuable tactics

Steven Lynch traces trends in personal injury disposal hearings

A defendant who fails to file an “acknowledgment of service” in response to a claim may have a default judgment entered against him. In such cases, and where liability of personal injury (PI) is not in dispute, costs of a defence are reduced and time in completing necessary quantum allocation questionnaires is saved.

Further, the court is given the opportunity to exercise its case management powers earlier as a “disposal” hearing will usually be listed within six to eight weeks from the date judgment was entered.

According to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), in PI claims the default judgment is “for an amount to be decided by the court and costs”.  Paragraph 12.4 of Practice Direction [PD] 26 states:
l The disposal hearing will not last longer than 30 minutes.
l Oral evidence is not usually heard.
l The court can either assess damages or give directions as to the future conduct of the proceedings.
l Evidence at a disposal hearing is by witness statement and statement of cases/application notices provided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll