header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Value added tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Sibcas Ltd [2017] UKUT 298 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 207 (Jul)

On a proper application of the law to the facts, the temporary school at issue which the taxpayer company had supplied had been fixed to or in the ground. It followed that the supply by the taxpayer to that school had been a letting of immovable property in the Community law sense, and had been an exempt supply in terms of s 31 and Item 1 of Group 1 of Part II of Sch 9 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994. Consequently, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) allowed the Revenue and Customs Commissioners’ appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) that that supply had been standard-rated. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll