header-logo header-logo

Value added tax

04 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Sibcas Ltd [2017] UKUT 298 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 207 (Jul)

On a proper application of the law to the facts, the temporary school at issue which the taxpayer company had supplied had been fixed to or in the ground. It followed that the supply by the taxpayer to that school had been a letting of immovable property in the Community law sense, and had been an exempt supply in terms of s 31 and Item 1 of Group 1 of Part II of Sch 9 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994. Consequently, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) allowed the Revenue and Customs Commissioners’ appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) that that supply had been standard-rated. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
back-to-top-scroll