header-logo header-logo

30 January 2015
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

VAT

Colaingrove Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2015] UKUT 2 (TCC), [2015] All ER (D) 160 (Jan)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (the tribunal) allowed the taxpayer company’s appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (FTT) in which the FTT had decided that although “static caravans” sold by the taxpayer were zero-rated, verandas sold by the taxpayer along with those caravans were not zero-rated. The tribunal decided that there was nothing in Group 9 of Sch 8 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 to exclude a veranda from the scope of zero-rating by reason of being part of a single supply of which the principal supply was a caravan.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll