header-logo header-logo

A very British institution?

29 September 2011 / Tim Suter
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Tim Suter traces the origins & achievements of public inquiries

“We have sought to establish the truth, insofar as it could be established.” The opening lines of the foreword to the report of the Rosemary Nelson Public Inquiry (HC 947) neatly encapsulate the overriding role of the modern public inquiry as a legal mechanism to investigate, examine, and report upon issues of grave public concern. Well-managed, a public inquiry can offer a cathartic opportunity that reassures public opinion and identifies lessons learned in the report upon its terms of reference.
The announcement of the Leveson Inquiry into issues arising from the News International phone hacking scandal highlights both how events and politics can suddenly combine to create the need for an inquiry and how little the public debate displays an understanding of the process, time, and money it will involve.

History matters

Public inquiry is a ubiquitous term that is applied to planning tribunals, investigations into transport accidents, and commissions on public policy reform.  

The modern public inquiry grew from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll