header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011 / Tim Suter
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A very British institution?

Tim Suter traces the origins & achievements of public inquiries

“We have sought to establish the truth, insofar as it could be established.” The opening lines of the foreword to the report of the Rosemary Nelson Public Inquiry (HC 947) neatly encapsulate the overriding role of the modern public inquiry as a legal mechanism to investigate, examine, and report upon issues of grave public concern. Well-managed, a public inquiry can offer a cathartic opportunity that reassures public opinion and identifies lessons learned in the report upon its terms of reference.
The announcement of the Leveson Inquiry into issues arising from the News International phone hacking scandal highlights both how events and politics can suddenly combine to create the need for an inquiry and how little the public debate displays an understanding of the process, time, and money it will involve.

History matters

Public inquiry is a ubiquitous term that is applied to planning tribunals, investigations into transport accidents, and commissions on public policy reform.  

The modern public inquiry grew from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll