header-logo header-logo

03 November 2017 / Ceri-Siân Williams
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Vicarious liability & the delegation of duty

nlj_7768_williams

The trend of expansion within the law of vicarious liability is likely to continue, says Ceri-Siân Williams

  • Could a non-delegable duty arise in situations where a deliberate assault is alleged?
  • The doctrine of vicarious liability has seen significant movement over the past decade.

In the highly publicised case of Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60, [2017] All ER (D) 87 (Oct) the appellant had been abused her foster parents. Although the abuse was not as a result of any negligence on the part of the local authority, the Supreme Court was asked to adjudicate on whether the local authority should nonetheless be obliged to compensate the appellant for the abuse. The appellant’s case was that the local authority was liable because it owed her a non-delegable duty of care and/or because it was vicariously liable for the foster parents’ deliberate wrongful acts.

No non-delegable duty

The court (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes) unanimously found that a non-delegable duty did not exist because:

  • parents
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll