header-logo header-logo

31 January 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Victory in court on legal aid rates for criminal defence

The Law Society has won its case in the High Court on criminal legal aid funding

Handing down judgment this week, Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Jay held the government’s failure to increase criminal defence solicitors’ legal aid rates by the bare minimum 15% were irrational and that the Lord Chancellor made insufficient enquiries as to the state of the criminal legal aid sector before making them. The 15% minimum increase was recommended in 2021 by the independent Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review (CLAIR), chaired by Lord Bellamy (subsequently appointed as a minister at the Ministry of Justice).

Giving judgment in Law Society of England and Wales v Lord Chancellor [2024] EWHC 155 (Admin), the court commented that the criminal justice system ‘is slowly coming apart at the seams’ and ‘unless there are significant injections of funding in the relatively near future, any prediction along the lines that the system will arrive in due course at a point of collapse is not overly pessimistic’.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘We are delighted the High Court has recognised that then Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab’s decision was irrational.

‘We may have won the court battle, but it’s the public who will lose out in custody suites and courtrooms across the country unless the government takes immediate action to stop the exodus of duty solicitors from the profession. 1,400 duty solicitors have left since 2017 because the work is not financially viable.

‘We are already seeing that there simply aren’t enough solicitors to represent suspects at police stations and magistrates’ courts day and night across the country. ‘This situation will only get worse, with potentially dangerous consequences for society.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll