header-logo header-logo

Victory in court on legal aid rates for criminal defence

31 January 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has won its case in the High Court on criminal legal aid funding

Handing down judgment this week, Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Jay held the government’s failure to increase criminal defence solicitors’ legal aid rates by the bare minimum 15% were irrational and that the Lord Chancellor made insufficient enquiries as to the state of the criminal legal aid sector before making them. The 15% minimum increase was recommended in 2021 by the independent Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review (CLAIR), chaired by Lord Bellamy (subsequently appointed as a minister at the Ministry of Justice).

Giving judgment in Law Society of England and Wales v Lord Chancellor [2024] EWHC 155 (Admin), the court commented that the criminal justice system ‘is slowly coming apart at the seams’ and ‘unless there are significant injections of funding in the relatively near future, any prediction along the lines that the system will arrive in due course at a point of collapse is not overly pessimistic’.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘We are delighted the High Court has recognised that then Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab’s decision was irrational.

‘We may have won the court battle, but it’s the public who will lose out in custody suites and courtrooms across the country unless the government takes immediate action to stop the exodus of duty solicitors from the profession. 1,400 duty solicitors have left since 2017 because the work is not financially viable.

‘We are already seeing that there simply aren’t enough solicitors to represent suspects at police stations and magistrates’ courts day and night across the country. ‘This situation will only get worse, with potentially dangerous consequences for society.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll