header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015 / Elizabeth Metliss
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

The view from the bench (II)

elizabethmetliss

Elizabeth Metliss considers the judicial view of witness statements

This is the second in a series of three articles discussing views expressed by Mr Justice Burton at a recent event at Mishcon de Reya’s offices and views of others members of the judiciary as outlined in reported cases. The first article explored how the judiciary view inter partes correspondence (see “The view from the bench” 164 NLJ 7633, p 18). This article examines judicial attitudes to another key aspect of the litigation process—witness statements.

Key communication

Witness statements, originally intended to avoid trial by ambush, provide a key opportunity for parties to communicate their versions of events to the other side. They can also be a useful resource for the trial judge in understanding how each side views its position and the factual background to a dispute.

While witness statements are written in the name of those closest to the dispute, it is invariably the lawyers who draft (and perhaps craft ) them. Lawyers want the statements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll