header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015 / Elizabeth Metliss
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail

The view from the bench (III)

metliss

Elizabeth Metliss considers the judicial view of law firms

This is the final piece in a series of three articles discussing views expressed by Mr Justice Burton at a recent event at Mishcon de Reya’s offices and views of other members of the judiciary as outlined in reported cases (see “The view from the bench” 164 NLJ 7633, p 18 and “The view from the bench (II) NLJ, 16 January 2015, p 18). The first article outlined how the judiciary views aggressive inter partes correspondence, the second examined judicial attitudes towards witness statements and this article will explore what may make a law firm stand out in the eyes of a judge during the course of any given set of proceedings.

Litigation drivers

There are many drivers in litigation which impact on lawyers’ behaviour. Solicitors need to think about the facts surrounding the dispute and the strength of their client’s claim, the right strategy in terms of engaging with the other side and how to enforce any judgment,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll