header-logo header-logo

Violations abroad

17 October 2009 / Julian Samiloff
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , EU , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Strasbourg is likely to play a major role in the development of global human rights law, says Julian Samiloff

In Al-Skeini v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26, [2007] All ER (D) 106 (Jun) the House of Lords ruled that Iraqi civilians arrested and detained by British soldiers had the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and consequently the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). The appeal may be divided into two parts. The first part concerned the cases of Iraqis killed as a result of British action in the streets of Basra, while the second arose out of the treatment of Baha Mousa—an Iraqi who was beaten to death while being detained at a British military base in Basra.

For the government it was argued that that because UK forces did not have full control of Iraq, Iraq could not be thought of as being within UK jurisdiction for the purposes of HRA 1998 and therefore the writ of the Convention could not run in Iraq. The law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll