The HLE blog releases a policy paper calling for action against sexual violence against men in conflict zones
A recent study of international human rights law by the University of California Law School found that while there are well over one hundred uses of the term “violence against women” (defined to include sexual violence), no human rights instruments explicitly address sexual violence against men. The use in some instruments of the term “gender-based violence”, which should in theory focus attention on violence against both genders, is in practice used solely in relation to violence against women.
So human rights advocacy work for men must rely on gender-neutral instruments which do not specifically address sexual abuse, such as the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights—stretching these instruments to fit a problem for which they were not designed.
This legal lacuna has serious consequences. While it is generally assumed correctly that women and girls are the primary victims of sexual violence, according to one analysis of prevalence studies in 1999, 3% of men worldwide had been raped in their lifetime (as children or adults)—representing, at that time, 210 million victims.
The HLE policy paper on this subject urges the UK government to work towards an instrument short of a treaty at UN level. This, it suggests, should take the form of a non-binding Declaration of the General Assembly on Sexual Violence Against Men in Conflict, which would definitively state the UNs’ opposition to such violence, and commitment to work towards the protection of victims.
Read the policy paper, authored by Tom Hennessey and Felicity Gerry, on the HLE website.
