header-logo header-logo

08 July 2010 / Costa Kypre
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Voyage of discovery

Costa Kypre examines the complications of cross-border disclosure

The prospect of embarking on a cross-border e-discovery exercise is complicated by the fact that many countries around the world have widely differing legal systems and philosophies with regard to data privacy and disclosure.

The US has a very broad discovery system, whereas member states of the European Union, Canada and Asia have a much more proportionate approach to disclosure and often have very complex data privacy rules, which specifically prohibit the liberal discovery approach taken by the US legal system.

This can be especially problematic when a cross-border discovery exercise is being led from the US. Further, now that many companies have a global presence, there is often data that may be relevant to an investigation or litigation which originates in one or more European offices. Europe in particular has a long history of fiercely protecting the individual’s right to privacy, which often causes an obstacle to a US-led discovery fulfilling its discovery obligations.

Potential consequences

The consequences of violating these conflicting principles can be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll