header-logo header-logo

Voyage of discovery

08 July 2010 / Costa Kypre
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Costa Kypre examines the complications of cross-border disclosure

The prospect of embarking on a cross-border e-discovery exercise is complicated by the fact that many countries around the world have widely differing legal systems and philosophies with regard to data privacy and disclosure.

The US has a very broad discovery system, whereas member states of the European Union, Canada and Asia have a much more proportionate approach to disclosure and often have very complex data privacy rules, which specifically prohibit the liberal discovery approach taken by the US legal system.

This can be especially problematic when a cross-border discovery exercise is being led from the US. Further, now that many companies have a global presence, there is often data that may be relevant to an investigation or litigation which originates in one or more European offices. Europe in particular has a long history of fiercely protecting the individual’s right to privacy, which often causes an obstacle to a US-led discovery fulfilling its discovery obligations.

Potential consequences

The consequences of violating these conflicting principles can be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll