header-logo header-logo

Voyage of discovery

08 July 2010 / Costa Kypre
Issue: 7425 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Costa Kypre examines the complications of cross-border disclosure

The prospect of embarking on a cross-border e-discovery exercise is complicated by the fact that many countries around the world have widely differing legal systems and philosophies with regard to data privacy and disclosure.

The US has a very broad discovery system, whereas member states of the European Union, Canada and Asia have a much more proportionate approach to disclosure and often have very complex data privacy rules, which specifically prohibit the liberal discovery approach taken by the US legal system.

This can be especially problematic when a cross-border discovery exercise is being led from the US. Further, now that many companies have a global presence, there is often data that may be relevant to an investigation or litigation which originates in one or more European offices. Europe in particular has a long history of fiercely protecting the individual’s right to privacy, which often causes an obstacle to a US-led discovery fulfilling its discovery obligations.

Potential consequences

The consequences of violating these conflicting principles can be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll