header-logo header-logo

Wanted: radiology expert input

15 August 2019 / Dr Owen Arthurs
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Dr Owen Arthurs examines the lack of expert radiologists in child protection cases

  • A national shortage of paediatric radiologists willing to engage in child abuse cases is compromising due process of law.
  • Active measures needed to change the culture and provide the best highly skilled experts available in a controversial area.

Cases relating to suspected child abuse are among the most sensitive and difficult cases that medical and legal professionals are required to deal with.

It is imperative that all parties—the children and their families, and the accused—have equal access to justice and due process. That process requires independent high-quality expert testimony on the medical evidence underpinning the legal case. In particular, expert evidence is often required in the criminal and family courts from paediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists, a relatively small pool of highly skilled and specialist radiologists. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find suitably experienced professionals to fulfil this important role.

Difficulty finding experts

Unfortunately, and for multiple reasons, the UK is currently facing a shortage of radiologists

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll