header-logo header-logo

Wanted: radiology expert input

15 August 2019 / Dr Owen Arthurs
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Dr Owen Arthurs examines the lack of expert radiologists in child protection cases

  • A national shortage of paediatric radiologists willing to engage in child abuse cases is compromising due process of law.
  • Active measures needed to change the culture and provide the best highly skilled experts available in a controversial area.

Cases relating to suspected child abuse are among the most sensitive and difficult cases that medical and legal professionals are required to deal with.

It is imperative that all parties—the children and their families, and the accused—have equal access to justice and due process. That process requires independent high-quality expert testimony on the medical evidence underpinning the legal case. In particular, expert evidence is often required in the criminal and family courts from paediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists, a relatively small pool of highly skilled and specialist radiologists. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find suitably experienced professionals to fulfil this important role.

Difficulty finding experts

Unfortunately, and for multiple reasons, the UK is currently facing a shortage of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll