header-logo header-logo

15 August 2019 / Dr Owen Arthurs
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Wanted: radiology expert input

Dr Owen Arthurs examines the lack of expert radiologists in child protection cases

  • A national shortage of paediatric radiologists willing to engage in child abuse cases is compromising due process of law.
  • Active measures needed to change the culture and provide the best highly skilled experts available in a controversial area.

Cases relating to suspected child abuse are among the most sensitive and difficult cases that medical and legal professionals are required to deal with.

It is imperative that all parties—the children and their families, and the accused—have equal access to justice and due process. That process requires independent high-quality expert testimony on the medical evidence underpinning the legal case. In particular, expert evidence is often required in the criminal and family courts from paediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists, a relatively small pool of highly skilled and specialist radiologists. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find suitably experienced professionals to fulfil this important role.

Difficulty finding experts

Unfortunately, and for multiple reasons, the UK is currently facing a shortage of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll