header-logo header-logo

Warding off injustice

04 July 2014 / James Wilson
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
backpage_0

James Wilson recalls Ward LJ’s frustration at the proliferation of litigants in person

The retirement of Lord Justice Ward was a memorable occasion, funny and sad in equal measure. I particularly enjoyed an anecdote about the time he leant over the bench and told a litigant in person to “get a life”. For offering that sage advice he was reprimanded by the judicial hierarchy, despite the fact that anyone who has experienced such individuals would agree with him. Another litigant in person (associated with the Fathers for Justice campaign group) once appeared before him in full Darth Vader costume. Ward LJ politely asked him to remove his helmet and lightsaber, and proceeded to refer to him as “Lord Vader” throughout the hearing.

Tricky case

One can therefore imagine Ward LJ’s heart sinking when confronted by a case conducted by litigants in person on both sides. He began his judgment ( Wright v Michael Wright Supplies Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 234) with the following:

“[1] This judgment will make depressing reading. It concerns a dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll