header-logo header-logo

Warning shots

05 July 2007 / Desmond Browne
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

The government should act now to counter concerns about the Legal Services Bill’s threat to independence, says Desmond Browne QC

Last week the Legal Services Bill completed the fifth and final day of its committee stage in the House of Commons. With its inbuilt majority, the government which had been defeated no less than six times in the House of Lords, where the Bill was introduced, could not resist the opportunity to reverse those defeats. So unless a compromise can be found, there is a prospect of what Parliamentarians call “ping-pong” between the House of Lords and the House of Commons this autumn.

detail of the lsb

Like the Law Society, the Bar Council has supported the thrust of the Clementi reforms and has no complaint about the underlying structure of the proposed legislation based on a new Legal Services Board (LSB). But the Bar does believe there are serious problems with the detail of the LSB. Those concerns were shared by the House of Lords.
An amendment promoted by Lord Neill QC to require the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll