header-logo header-logo

05 July 2007 / Desmond Browne
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Warning shots

The government should act now to counter concerns about the Legal Services Bill’s threat to independence, says Desmond Browne QC

Last week the Legal Services Bill completed the fifth and final day of its committee stage in the House of Commons. With its inbuilt majority, the government which had been defeated no less than six times in the House of Lords, where the Bill was introduced, could not resist the opportunity to reverse those defeats. So unless a compromise can be found, there is a prospect of what Parliamentarians call “ping-pong” between the House of Lords and the House of Commons this autumn.

detail of the lsb

Like the Law Society, the Bar Council has supported the thrust of the Clementi reforms and has no complaint about the underlying structure of the proposed legislation based on a new Legal Services Board (LSB). But the Bar does believe there are serious problems with the detail of the LSB. Those concerns were shared by the House of Lords.
An amendment promoted by Lord Neill QC to require the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll