header-logo header-logo

Watch out!

17 January 2014 / David Finnerty
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
web_finnerty

David Finnerty provides advice on how to avoid a professional negligence claim in a contested probate case

Recent reports have shown a 700% increase over the past five years in contested probate cases involving the challenge of a will. Many of these cases will have scrutinised the conduct of solicitors to decide whether they were negligent in their actions and advice. The financial and reputational implications of any such finding can be significant.

Duty of care

When managing a will, solicitors owe a duty of care to both testators and beneficiaries. Numerous cases exist of solicitors being found to be in breach of this duty, from failing to properly assess testamentary capacity, to not dealing with medical evidence issues promptly, to not identifying a testator who was being unduly influenced.

It is understandable that solicitors who specialise in non-contentious probate can be unprepared for litigation. So if the work you do could leave you susceptible to a claim, how can you minimise the risk of being found professionally negligent?

Capacity

The issue of capacity is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll