header-logo header-logo

Watch out!

17 January 2014 / David Finnerty
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
web_finnerty

David Finnerty provides advice on how to avoid a professional negligence claim in a contested probate case

Recent reports have shown a 700% increase over the past five years in contested probate cases involving the challenge of a will. Many of these cases will have scrutinised the conduct of solicitors to decide whether they were negligent in their actions and advice. The financial and reputational implications of any such finding can be significant.

Duty of care

When managing a will, solicitors owe a duty of care to both testators and beneficiaries. Numerous cases exist of solicitors being found to be in breach of this duty, from failing to properly assess testamentary capacity, to not dealing with medical evidence issues promptly, to not identifying a testator who was being unduly influenced.

It is understandable that solicitors who specialise in non-contentious probate can be unprepared for litigation. So if the work you do could leave you susceptible to a claim, how can you minimise the risk of being found professionally negligent?

Capacity

The issue of capacity is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll