header-logo header-logo

17 January 2014 / David Finnerty
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Watch out!

web_finnerty

David Finnerty provides advice on how to avoid a professional negligence claim in a contested probate case

Recent reports have shown a 700% increase over the past five years in contested probate cases involving the challenge of a will. Many of these cases will have scrutinised the conduct of solicitors to decide whether they were negligent in their actions and advice. The financial and reputational implications of any such finding can be significant.

Duty of care

When managing a will, solicitors owe a duty of care to both testators and beneficiaries. Numerous cases exist of solicitors being found to be in breach of this duty, from failing to properly assess testamentary capacity, to not dealing with medical evidence issues promptly, to not identifying a testator who was being unduly influenced.

It is understandable that solicitors who specialise in non-contentious probate can be unprepared for litigation. So if the work you do could leave you susceptible to a claim, how can you minimise the risk of being found professionally negligent?

Capacity

The issue of capacity is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll