header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008 / Sarah Greer
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Public , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Watching the clock

A recent appeal court case may prompt lenders to evict defaulting mortgagors sooner rather than later, says Sarah Greer

The recent Court of Appeal decision of Ashe v National Westminster Bank plc [2008] EWCA Civ 55, [2008] All ER (D) 128 (Feb) sent a collective shiver down the spines of mortgage providers already feeling the impact of the current credit crunch. Although Mummery LJ made it clear that the practical implications of the decision were “in danger of being exaggerated”, it will undoubtedly cause lenders to look again at their policies on obtaining possession of properties from defaulting mortgagors.

The Facts

In 1989, the Babais granted a second legal charge over their home in Stockport to the National Westminster Bank (the bank) to secure Mr Babai's liabilities on his accounts with the bank. There was already a first mortgage on the property with the Halifax. Under the terms of the agreement, the bank had an immediate right to possession of the property, and this was not restricted under the agreement or reliant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll