header-logo header-logo

24 November 2017
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

 

Air traffic—Airport

R (on the application of Monarch Airlines Ltd (in administration)) v Airport Co-ordination Ltd (Manchester Airports Group plc intervening) [2017] EWHC 2896 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 129 (Nov)

The defendant was not under a duty to allocate summer 2018 permissions to use airport infrastructure necessary for the operation of air services at specified times for the purpose of the taking off and landing of aircraft to the claimant airline (Monarch), which was in administration. The Divisional Court, in dismissing Monarch’s application for judicial review, held that such a duty would not accord with the purpose underlying the relevant regulations and Monarch was not an air carrier.

Bankruptcy

Re Brown; Official Receiver v Brown [2017] EWHC 2728 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 135 (Nov)

The Official Receiver’s certification of the respondent bankrupt’s non-compliance with the Insolvency Act 1986 had been correct and, in the absence of any reasonable excuse for non-compliance, the respondent was guilty of contempt of court and liable to be punished. So held the Chancery Division in circumstances where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll