header-logo header-logo

Weekly law digests

27 April 2018
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs—Appeal

Surrey (A Child and Protected Party, by his Litigation Friend, Surrey) v Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust; AH (A Protected Party, by her Litigation Friend, XXX) v Lewisham Healthcare NHS Trust; Yesil (A Child and Protected Party, by his Litigation Friend, Yesil) v Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 451 [2018] All ER (D) 25 (Apr)

The changed funding arrangements, from legal aid to Conditional Funding Arrangements, were not reasonable on the basis that the litigation friends had agreed to the change without having been told that the consequence would be the ‘loss’ of a 10% uplift. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, accordingly allowed the appeal from the decision of the Queen’s Bench Division.

Costs—Order for costs

NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group v LB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and another [2018] EWCOP 7 [2018] All ER (D) 07 (Apr)

The present was not an appropriate case for an order for costs against the applicant for what were intended to be test cases, seeking clarification

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll