header-logo header-logo

27 April 2018
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Costs—Appeal

Surrey (A Child and Protected Party, by his Litigation Friend, Surrey) v Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust; AH (A Protected Party, by her Litigation Friend, XXX) v Lewisham Healthcare NHS Trust; Yesil (A Child and Protected Party, by his Litigation Friend, Yesil) v Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 451 [2018] All ER (D) 25 (Apr)

The changed funding arrangements, from legal aid to Conditional Funding Arrangements, were not reasonable on the basis that the litigation friends had agreed to the change without having been told that the consequence would be the ‘loss’ of a 10% uplift. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, accordingly allowed the appeal from the decision of the Queen’s Bench Division.

Costs—Order for costs

NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group v LB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and another [2018] EWCOP 7 [2018] All ER (D) 07 (Apr)

The present was not an appropriate case for an order for costs against the applicant for what were intended to be test cases, seeking clarification

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll