header-logo header-logo

08 June 2018
Issue: 7796 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Child

Re S (a child) (abduction: Hague Convention or BIIa) [2018] EWCA Civ 1226, [2018] All ER (D) 149 (May)

Where a child, habitually resident in England and Wales, was alleged to have been wrongfully removed to or retained in another EU member state, the England and Wales courts had the power to make a return order summarily at the outset of proceedings when it had substantive jurisdiction under Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003. However, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that, absent a good reason to the contrary, the better course was for the court to defer making a return order until an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980 had been determined in the other member state.

Employment

R (on the application of the Fire Brigades Union) v South Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority [2018] EWHC 1229 (Admin), [2018] All ER (D) 150 (May)

The defendant Fire and Rescue Authority’s shift system which involved periods during a working week of 96 hours of continuous duty, other

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll