header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Capital gains tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Higgins [2018] UKUT 280 (TCC), [2018] All ER (D) 66 (Sep)

The First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) had been wrong to find that the period of ownership, pursuant to ss 222 and 223 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992, could only begin when the respondent tax payer had legal title to the apartment and a legal right to occupy the apartment. Accordingly, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) allowed the appellant Revenue and Customs Commissioners appeal in relation to the payment of capital gains tax by the tax payer on the sale of a property that had been purchased off-plan.

Coroner

R (on the application of Hambleton and others) v Coroner for the Birmingham Inquests (1974) [2018] EWCA Civ 2081, [2018] All ER (D) 62 (Sep)

The defendant coroner’s decision not to call evidence directed to identifying those who planned, planted, procured and authorised the bombs used from the scope of the inquest into the Birmingham bombings had not been unlawful in the public law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll