header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Capital gains tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Higgins [2018] UKUT 280 (TCC), [2018] All ER (D) 66 (Sep)

The First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) had been wrong to find that the period of ownership, pursuant to ss 222 and 223 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992, could only begin when the respondent tax payer had legal title to the apartment and a legal right to occupy the apartment. Accordingly, the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) allowed the appellant Revenue and Customs Commissioners appeal in relation to the payment of capital gains tax by the tax payer on the sale of a property that had been purchased off-plan.

Coroner

R (on the application of Hambleton and others) v Coroner for the Birmingham Inquests (1974) [2018] EWCA Civ 2081, [2018] All ER (D) 62 (Sep)

The defendant coroner’s decision not to call evidence directed to identifying those who planned, planted, procured and authorised the bombs used from the scope of the inquest into the Birmingham bombings had not been unlawful in the public law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll