header-logo header-logo

01 November 2018
Issue: 7815 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Costs

First National Trustco (UK) Ltd and another company v Page and others [2018] EWHC 899 (Ch), [2018] All ER (D) 148 (Apr)

The defendants’ application for relief from sanctions pursuant to CPR 3.9(1) for a failure to file their costs budget was rejected. The Chancery Division held that the defendants’ failure to comply with directions was serious and significant, had been caused by the solicitor’s misunderstanding of the effect of court documents which was not a good enough reason for the breach, and thus considering all the circumstances of the case, relief from sanctions ought not be granted.

Customs & excise

Invicta Foods Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2018] EWCA Civ 2204, [2018] All ER (D) 98 (Oct)

The respondent, Revenue and Customs Commissioners, were wrong to classify an imported raw seasoned chicken product by the appellant, Invicta, under Ch 2 of the Combined Nomenclature (CN) (the system used to classify imported products for customs duty purposes and to impose a common customs tariff on imports from outside the European Union). The Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll