header-logo header-logo

07 February 2019
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Arbitration

HPOR Servicos De Consultoria Ltda v DryShips Inc and another company [2018] EWHC 3451 (Comm), [2019] All ER (D) 111 (Jan)

The majority of an arbitration tribunal had not erred in concluding that the claimant Brazilian special purpose vehicle (HPOR) had to forfeit pre- and post-termination remuneration in respect of an agency agreement entered into with the defendant companies, in circumstances where HPOR had been found to have breached its fiduciary duties to them. The Commercial Court ruled, among other things, that the present case concerned serious breaches and was exactly the kind of case where forfeiture of remuneration was appropriate. However, the court ruled that the majority of the tribunal had erred in apparently considering that the case concerned the remedy of an account of profits.

Copyright

British Broadcasting Corporation and another company v Mechanical-Copyright Protection Society Ltd and other companies (ITV Networks Ltd intervening) [2018] EWHC 2931 (Ch), [2018] All ER (D) 177 (Nov)

The Chancery Division considered the powers of the Copyright Tribunal (the tribunal), in a dispute concerning four

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll