header-logo header-logo

22 March 2019
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Company

Re Peak Hotels and Resorts Ltd; Crumpler and another (joint liquidators of Peak Hotels and Resorts Ltd) v Candey Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 345, [2019] All ER (D) 48 (Mar)

The appellant liquidators’ appeal succeeded, in a dispute concerning the valuation of sums owed to the respondent solicitors following the liquidation of a company for which the solicitors had carried out work. The Court of Appeal held that the judge’s approach to the construction of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and its application to the present case could not stand. The whole concept of provision of services in return for a fixed fee had to be disregarded in the present case, because such a concept was incompatible with the exercise which IA 1986 s 245(6) required to be performed.

Contract

Harcus Sinclair LLP and another v Your Lawyers Ltd and another [2019] EWCA Civ 335, [2019] All ER (D) 58 (Mar)

The judge had taken into account matters that he should not have taken into account in applying the relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll