header-logo header-logo

08 August 2019
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Weekly law digests

Disclosure

Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) [2019] UKSC 38, [2019] All ER (D) 161 (Jul)

It was settled law that courts had an inherent jurisdiction to allow access to materials used in the course of court proceedings, based on the constitutional principle of open justice. A non-party seeking access to court documents had to explain why he sought it and how granting access would advance that principle. The Supreme Court so ruled, in dismissing the appellant company’s (Cape’s) appeal, and the respondent’s cross-appeal on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK (Forum), concerning how much of the written material placed before the court in earlier proceedings brought against Cape, by certain employers’ insurers, for a contribution in respect of damages paid to the employers’ former employees who had contracted mesothelioma in the course of their employment. Those proceedings had been settled and Forum, which had not been a party in them, had applied for copies of documents used in the proceedings. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
Refusing mediation need not trigger a costs penalty, but litigators must justify their position
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
back-to-top-scroll