header-logo header-logo

Weekly law digests

08 August 2019
Issue: 7852 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Disclosure

Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) [2019] UKSC 38, [2019] All ER (D) 161 (Jul)

It was settled law that courts had an inherent jurisdiction to allow access to materials used in the course of court proceedings, based on the constitutional principle of open justice. A non-party seeking access to court documents had to explain why he sought it and how granting access would advance that principle. The Supreme Court so ruled, in dismissing the appellant company’s (Cape’s) appeal, and the respondent’s cross-appeal on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK (Forum), concerning how much of the written material placed before the court in earlier proceedings brought against Cape, by certain employers’ insurers, for a contribution in respect of damages paid to the employers’ former employees who had contracted mesothelioma in the course of their employment. Those proceedings had been settled and Forum, which had not been a party in them, had applied for copies of documents used in the proceedings. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll