header-logo header-logo

30 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Technology
printer mail-detail

Weighed down by admin?

Nearly half of all lawyers feel burdened by too much ‘low-value’ administrative work, research shows

In the UK, two-thirds of lawyers gave the opportunity to work in an intellectually stimulating environment as a key reason for their choice of profession, and more than a third became lawyers to do ‘rewarding work’, according to a survey of 258 lawyers (125 in the UK and 133 in the USA).

The survey, conducted by legal industry cloud provider Intapp, revealed that three-fifths of UK lawyers are satisfied with their work-life balance. However, 45% of UK lawyers complain they do more administrative tasks than they expected and nearly a fifth (18%) say either the majority or nearly all of their time is spent on low-value work.

Asked about technology and their expectations for the future, 30% of UK lawyers wanted their firm to modernise the workflow process and 29% felt their firm should provide services to make elements of their legal work more efficient.

Some 44% of UK lawyers want to see their firm invest in content or document management systems, 28% want to see investment in mobile-enabled technologies and 41% feel that artificial technology (AI) could help improve conflicts clearance.

Chris Turk, regional vice president, EMEA of Intapp, said: ‘These survey results have shown the impact that tools and processes available can have on the daily life of a lawyer.

‘Modern firms―those that take into account the environment of a firm, and the impact of technology on its employees―are the ones that will see the most positive change.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll