header-logo header-logo

Welcome to the party

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

How will third party funding affect the legal landscape? Jonathan Wheeler and Felicity Potter consider the possibilities

Third party funding enables claimants who have a reasonably strong case to bring litigation they would otherwise be unable to bring and so promotes access to justice. It is also potentially an attractive tool for corporates who can afford to litigate but who do not want to incur any of the costs or risks associated with litigation. Anecdotally, however, it seems that few corporates have expressed a serious interest in litigation funding, mainly due to its high cost in terms of recoveries which would have to be given up to the funder in the event of success.

The third party funding market is still a young market and advisers and funders alike are feeling their way. Funders are generally interested in large commercial disputes and will only fund cases where there is a high prospect of success. The funding process can be lengthy because the funder will wish to scrutinise closely the merits of the case and, consequently, arrangements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll