header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

What lies ahead?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
26 September 2014 / Kirstie Gibson
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Kirstie Gibson considers the report of the Family Mediation Task Force & the Ministry of Justice’s response

The Family Mediation Task Force (FMTF) was created in response to the fall in publicly-funded mediations and the rise of litigants in person and chaired by David Norgrove, formerly of the Family Justice Review, and current chair of the Family Justice Board. The FMTF membership includes representatives from Resolution, the Family Justice Council, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, together with family law practitioners and academics.

Despite the government’s long professed love for mediation as a way to divert family disputes away from the courts, there has been a steep decline in public spending on mediation. The FMTF report summarises the immediate issues facing the mediation sector and makes recommendations to encourage out-of-court dispute resolution in family cases.

How did we get here?

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) changed the landscape for legal aid in family matters, removing legal aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor finance faces £11bn reckoning
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
NLJ this week: Gold on Awaab’s Law & digital divorce
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
NLJ this week: AI in the dock—courts need literacy, not fear
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Landlords lose their upward climb
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
NLJ this week: Privy Council undresses the ‘shareholder rule’
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll