header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 September 2014 / Kirstie Gibson
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What lies ahead?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Kirstie Gibson considers the report of the Family Mediation Task Force & the Ministry of Justice’s response

The Family Mediation Task Force (FMTF) was created in response to the fall in publicly-funded mediations and the rise of litigants in person and chaired by David Norgrove, formerly of the Family Justice Review, and current chair of the Family Justice Board. The FMTF membership includes representatives from Resolution, the Family Justice Council, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, together with family law practitioners and academics.

Despite the government’s long professed love for mediation as a way to divert family disputes away from the courts, there has been a steep decline in public spending on mediation. The FMTF report summarises the immediate issues facing the mediation sector and makes recommendations to encourage out-of-court dispute resolution in family cases.

How did we get here?

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) changed the landscape for legal aid in family matters, removing legal aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll