header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

What lies ahead?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
26 September 2014 / Kirstie Gibson
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Kirstie Gibson considers the report of the Family Mediation Task Force & the Ministry of Justice’s response

The Family Mediation Task Force (FMTF) was created in response to the fall in publicly-funded mediations and the rise of litigants in person and chaired by David Norgrove, formerly of the Family Justice Review, and current chair of the Family Justice Board. The FMTF membership includes representatives from Resolution, the Family Justice Council, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, together with family law practitioners and academics.

Despite the government’s long professed love for mediation as a way to divert family disputes away from the courts, there has been a steep decline in public spending on mediation. The FMTF report summarises the immediate issues facing the mediation sector and makes recommendations to encourage out-of-court dispute resolution in family cases.

How did we get here?

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) changed the landscape for legal aid in family matters, removing legal aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When silence speaks volumes
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll